Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Bowen
296 U.S. 546, 56 S. Ct. 174
Opinion
The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 163— 164; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Browne v. Union Pacific B. Co., 267 U. S. 255, 258-259.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Bowen, 296 U.S. 546, 56 S. Ct. 174 (1935).
296 U.S. 546 (Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.
243 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Browne v. Union Pacific Railroad
267 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1925)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)