Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Bowen
296 U.S. 546, 56 S. Ct. 174
This text of 296 U.S. 546 (Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Capital Endowment Co. v. Ohio ex rel. Bowen, 296 U.S. 546, 56 S. Ct. 174 (1935).
Opinion
The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 163— 164; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Browne v. Union Pacific B. Co., 267 U. S. 255, 258-259.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.
243 U.S. 157 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Browne v. Union Pacific Railroad
267 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1925)
McCoy v. Shaw
277 U.S. 302 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 546, 56 S. Ct. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-endowment-co-v-ohio-ex-rel-bowen-scotus-1935.