Capital City Country Club, Inc. v. Tucker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Capital City Country Club, Inc. v. Tucker

580 So. 2d 789, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3634, 1991 WL 60028

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2551

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 580 So. 2d 789 (Capital City Country Club, Inc. v. Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capital City Country Club, Inc. v. Tucker, 580 So. 2d 789, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3634, 1991 WL 60028 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

For a dollar per year, appellant, Capital City Country Club (CCCC), leases a 192-acre tract of land from the City of Tallahassee (City) on which it operates and maintains a private golf course. First, CCCC asserts that the property is exempt from ad valorem taxation because it paid an intangible property tax for its leasehold interest in the property. Second, CCCC contends that even if the property is subject to ad valorem and intangible property taxes, the appraiser erred in failing to deduct the value of CCCC’s leasehold interest from the fair market value of the property for purposes of calculating the ad valorem tax. We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court and find that CCCC failed to show that the subject property was improperly taxed. See Section 196.199(2), Florida Statutes; Schultz v. TM Florida-Ohio Realty Ltd. Partnership, 577 So.2d 573 (Fla.1991); Valencia Center v. Bystrom, 543 So.2d 214 (Fla.1989); City of Orlando v. Hausman, 534 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), review denied, 544 So.2d 199 (Fla.1989); In re Advisory Opinion of the Governor, 509 So.2d 292 (Fla.1987); Valencia Center, Inc. v. Publix Super Markets, 464 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 475 So.2d 696 (Fla.1985); Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Bryant, 170 So.2d 822 (Fla.1964).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For a dollar per year, appellant, Capital City Country Club (CCCC), leases a 192-acre tract of land from the City of Tallahassee (City) on which it operates and maintains a private golf course. First, CCCC asserts that the property is exempt from ad valorem taxation because it paid an intangible property tax for its leasehold interest in the property. Second, CCCC contends that even if the property is subject to ad valorem and intangible property taxes, the appraiser erred in failing to deduct the value of CCCC’s leasehold interest from the fair market value of the property for purposes of calculating the ad valorem tax. We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court and find that CCCC failed to show that the subject property was improperly taxed. See Section 196.199(2), Florida Statutes; Schultz v. TM Florida-Ohio Realty Ltd. Partnership, 577 So.2d 573 (Fla.1991); Valencia Center v. Bystrom, 543 So.2d 214 (Fla.1989); City of Orlando v. Hausman, 534 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), review denied, 544 So.2d 199 (Fla.1989); In re Advisory Opinion of the Governor, 509 So.2d 292 (Fla.1987); Valencia Center, Inc. v. Publix Super Markets, 464 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 475 So.2d 696 (Fla.1985); Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. Bryant, 170 So.2d 822 (Fla.1964).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, JOANOS and MINER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 So. 2d 789, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3634, 1991 WL 60028, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-city-country-club-inc-v-tucker-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack