Capital Bank v. Manguart
549 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197, 1989 WL 110944
Opinion
Appellant Capital Bank appeals from a post-judgment order granting a motion for a protective order directing that the deposition of a nonparty witness, not be had. We quash the protective order. The deposition sought can proceed subject to claims of privilege to be brought before the trial court. See Young, Stern & Tannenbaum, P.A. v. Smith, 416 So.2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The protective order is quashed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capital Bank v. Manguart, 549 So. 2d 234, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5197, 1989 WL 110944 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
549 So. 2d 234 (Capital Bank v. Manguart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
YOUNG, STERN & TANNENBAUM v. Smith
416 So. 2d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)