Capital Bank v. Garvin

45 Iowa 708
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 18, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Iowa 708 (Capital Bank v. Garvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capital Bank v. Garvin, 45 Iowa 708 (iowa 1877).

Opinion

Rothrock, J.

It appears from the pleadings in this case that David H. Johnson was the owner of a farm in Davis county, Iowa, and a house and two lots in the city of Topeka, Kansas. W. J. Garvin was the owner of a farm in Douglass county, Kansas. In December, 1878, an exchange of the property owned by said parties was made, by which Johnson conveyed to the wife of Garvin the farm in Iowa, and the house and lots in Topeka, and Garvin conveyed to the wife of Johnson the farm in Kansas.

At the time of these conveyances, Johnson was largely indebted to the Capital Bank of Topeka, appellant herein. It is sought in this action to impeach said conveyances for fraud, and to subject the land in Iowa to the payment of the debt of Johnson to the bank. The court below rendered a decree dismissing the plaintiff’s petition. The plaintiff appeals.

We have all the evidence before us, and a careful examination of it has brought us to the conclusion that the decree of the District Court is correct. A discussion of the evidence here would serve no useful purpose. It is enough to say that, in our judgment, the alleged fraud is not sufficiently established to warrant us in holding that the conveyance should be set aside and the land subjected to the payment of plaintiff’s debt.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Iowa 708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capital-bank-v-garvin-iowa-1877.