Capili v. Ilagan

26 A.D.3d 354, 810 N.Y.S.2d 480
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 26 A.D.3d 354 (Capili v. Ilagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capili v. Ilagan, 26 A.D.3d 354, 810 N.Y.S.2d 480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for the partition and sale of real property, the defendant Noemi Iris Hagan appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), dated June 14, 2004, which, inter alia, confirmed the report of a referee dated March 24, 2003.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“The report of a Referee should be confirmed whenever the findings are substantially supported by the record, and the Referee has clearly defined the issues and resolved matters of credibility” (Stone v Stone, 229 AD2d 388, 388 [1996]; see Pittoni v Boland, 278 AD2d 396 [2000]; Slater v Links at N. Hills, 262 AD2d 299 [1999]; Tai Wing Hong Importers v King Realty Corp., 208 AD2d 710, 711 [1994]). Here, the referee’s determination that the balance of the plaintiffs $26,000 loan to the defendant had been reduced to approximately $13,000 was substantially supported by the record. In addition, the record also supported the referee’s determination that the proceeds from the sale of the premises should be divided equally between the parties, after satisfaction of the mortgage lien and repayment of the personal loan, as well as other mandated expenses. Moreover, the Supreme Court properly accepted the referee’s report despite its late filing (see Matter of Lipsky v Koplen, 282 AD2d 462 [2001]; John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v 491-499 Seventh Ave. Assoc., 169 Misc 2d 493 [1996]; see also CPLR 4320).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burns v. Burns
2024 NY Slip Op 03875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
State of New York v. Winkle
2020 NY Slip Op 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Wynkoop v. 622A President St. Owners Corp.
2019 NY Slip Op 1451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Pathak v. Shukla
2018 NY Slip Op 5776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Zupa v. Keitt
84 A.D.3d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Donovan v. Empire Insurance Group
49 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Blangiardo v. Horstmann
32 A.D.3d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 A.D.3d 354, 810 N.Y.S.2d 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capili-v-ilagan-nyappdiv-2006.