Capewell v. Ormsby
This text of 2 E.D. Smith 180 (Capewell v. Ormsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If any thing is omitted in the return, the remedy of the appellant is to procure a further return. The whole of the appellant’s argument, or that which is material to show that the j udgment was erroneous, is founded upon facts which do not appear on the return. He should have made an application to compel the justice to return as to these facts, and having neglected to do so, his case must now stand upon the return as it is.
[181]*181[The opinion proceeds to discuss the evidence and rulings in the court below, as certified in the return, and concludes with concurring in the propriety of the judgment.]
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 E.D. Smith 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capewell-v-ormsby-nyctcompl-1853.