Capers v. State
This text of 146 S.E. 127 (Capers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The only complaint in this case is based upon the general ground of the motion for a netv trial, on the contention that the verdict finding the accused guilty is, for the absence of sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction, contrary to law. The evidence of the accomplice ivas sufficiently corroborated to authorize the conviction of the accused, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a neiv trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 S.E. 127, 167 Ga. 532, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capers-v-state-ga-1928.