Capers v. State

146 S.E. 127, 167 Ga. 532, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 183

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The only complaint in this case is based upon the general ground of the motion for a netv trial, on the contention that the verdict finding the accused guilty is, for the absence of sufficient evidence to authorize the conviction, contrary to law. The evidence of the accomplice ivas sufficiently corroborated to authorize the conviction of the accused, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a neiv trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except