Capers v. Fripp
24 S.C.L. 224
This text of 24 S.C.L. 224 (Capers v. Fripp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Capers v. Fripp, 24 S.C.L. 224 (S.C. Ct. App. 1839).
Opinion
The court considers the charge of the presiding judge correct and sufficient, according to the essential facts of the case, and the verdict satisfactory; but avoids giving any opinion upon questions not essential to the particular case and the verdict for the plaintiff.
The motion is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 S.C.L. 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capers-v-fripp-scctapp-1839.