Capen v. State
This text of 616 So. 2d 631 (Capen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state conceding that revocation of appellant’s probation upon the ground of resisting arrest was erroneously based entirely on hearsay, the only remaining ground for revocation is the proven failure of appellant to file one monthly report.
We remand to the trial court to give it the opportunity to decide if this latter ground alone is sufficient in its eyes, under the circumstances hereof, to revoke appellant’s probation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 So. 2d 631, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4560, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capen-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.