Capen v. Department of Employment & Training

Supreme Court of Vermont

Capen v. Department of Employment & Training

466 A.2d 1166, 143 Vt. 290, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 546

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedSeptember 6, 1983

DocketNo. 82-239

StatusPublished

This text of 466 A.2d 1166 (Capen v. Department of Employment & Training) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capen v. Department of Employment & Training, 466 A.2d 1166, 143 Vt. 290, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 546 (Vt. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Employment Security Board [Board] affirming its appeals referee’s denial of unemployment compensation benefits to claimant. The claimant argues that the Board’s findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous. We disagree and affirm.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows. Claimant, asserting she was overworked and underpaid, quit her nurses aide position at Hanson Court Convalescent Home on October 30, 1981. She filed a claim for unemployment compensation benefits on January 11, 1982. On January 26, 1982, a claims examiner found claimant disqualified for benefits on the ground that she had left her job voluntarily and without good cause attributable to her employer. On February 23, 1982, an appeals referee sustained the examiner’s finding. On March 26, 1982, the Board sustained the referee’s decision. This appeal followed.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find that there [291]*291is no credible evidence which casts any doubt on the correctness of the Board’s decision. The Board’s findings and conclusion are supported by the evidence and therefore must be affirmed. Davis v. Department of Employment Security, 140 Vt. 269, 276, 438 A.2d 375, 379 (1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Employment Security Board [Board] affirming its appeals referee’s denial of unemployment compensation benefits to claimant. The claimant argues that the Board’s findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous. We disagree and affirm.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows. Claimant, asserting she was overworked and underpaid, quit her nurses aide position at Hanson Court Convalescent Home on October 30, 1981. She filed a claim for unemployment compensation benefits on January 11, 1982. On January 26, 1982, a claims examiner found claimant disqualified for benefits on the ground that she had left her job voluntarily and without good cause attributable to her employer. On February 23, 1982, an appeals referee sustained the examiner’s finding. On March 26, 1982, the Board sustained the referee’s decision. This appeal followed.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find that there [291]*291is no credible evidence which casts any doubt on the correctness of the Board’s decision. The Board’s findings and conclusion are supported by the evidence and therefore must be affirmed. Davis v. Department of Employment Security, 140 Vt. 269, 276, 438 A.2d 375, 379 (1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 A.2d 1166, 143 Vt. 290, 1983 Vt. LEXIS 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capen-v-department-of-employment-training-vt-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack