Capello v. Village of Suffern

232 A.D.2d 599, 648 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11326
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 28, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 599 (Capello v. Village of Suffern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Capello v. Village of Suffern, 232 A.D.2d 599, 648 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Miller, J.), dated August 28, 1995, which denied its motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

"As a general rule, [sports] participants properly may be held to have consented, by their participation, to those injury-causing events which are known, apparent, or are reasonably foreseeable consequences of the participation” (Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432, 439; Egeth v County of Westchester, 206 AD2d 502). In the instant matter, the plaintiff claimed to have sustained injuries after he slipped and fell on the defendant’s basketball court, allegedly as a result of the accumulation of a powdery or dusty substance on the floor of the court. The plaintiff had played on the court on as many as 15 occasions over a two-year period and he had previously encountered the substance on the court which he knew to be slippery. Under these circumstances, we find that the plaintiff assumed the [600]*600obvious risk of injury inherent in playing basketball on a court he knew to be slippery and is therefore precluded from recovery (see, Marescot v St. Augustine’s R. C. School, 226 AD2d 507; Steward v Town of Clarkstown, 224 AD2d 405; Brown v City of Peekskill, 212 AD2d 658). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lungen v. Harbors Haverstraw Homeowners Assn., Inc.
206 A.D.3d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Morlock v. Town of North Hempstead
12 A.D.3d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Brunsden v. Town of Eastchester
278 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Levinson v. Incorporated Village of Bayville
250 A.D.2d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Rutnik v. Colonie Center Court Club, Inc.
249 A.D.2d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Regan v. State
237 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D.2d 599, 648 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capello-v-village-of-suffern-nyappdiv-1996.