Capella v. Coleman Institute

707 So. 2d 1210, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3842, 1998 WL 171688
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 1998·No. No. 97-4267·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting a temporary injunction in this case because the posting of a bond was required and no reason was given for waiving it. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(b); Layne & Brill, P.A. v. Brill, 453 So.2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); International Bhd. of Teamsters v. Miami Retail Grocers, Inc., 76 So.2d 491 (Fla.1954).

Courts have upheld the bond requirement in the context of a covenant not to compete, such as the one in the instant case. See Richard v. Behavioral Healthcare Options, Inc., 647 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Although in the agreement containing the covenant not to compete the appellant consented to an injunction upon a breach, the requirement of the posting of a bond was not waived. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to set a bond for the issuance of the injunction.

WARNER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capella v. Coleman Institute, 707 So. 2d 1210, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3842, 1998 WL 171688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

707 So. 2d 1210 (Capella v. Coleman Institute) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richard v. BEHAV. HEALTHCARE OPTIONS
647 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Miami Retail Grocers, Inc.
76 So. 2d 491 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Layne & Brill, P.A. v. Brill
453 So. 2d 890 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)