Capek v. Demetrowitz
This text of 253 A.D. 917 (Capek v. Demetrowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The form of the denials is fatally defective. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 261; D. & G. Girl Coat Co., Inc., v. Kafka, 218 App. Div. 607; affd., without opinion, 245 N. Y. 646.) In our opinion the plaintiff was also entitled to summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Therefore, no leave to amend the answer is granted. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 917, 2 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capek-v-demetrowitz-nyappdiv-1938.