Capehart v. State

202 So. 3d 958, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16233
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2016·No. No. 1D16-884·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied except as it relates to the trial court’s oral pronouncement prohibiting early termination of probation, which is hereby stricken. See Arriaga v. State, 666 So.2d 949 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Since this pronouncement was not reduced to writing, there is no need to remand for correction of the judgment and sentence or the order of probation.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capehart v. State, 202 So. 3d 958, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16233 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

202 So. 3d 958 (Capehart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arriaga v. State
666 So. 2d 949 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)