Capco 1998-D7 Pipestone, LLC v. Milton Ventures Limited Partnership

713 N.W.2d 769, 475 Mich. 856
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 2006·No. 129920·Published

Opinion

713 N.W.2d 769 (2006)
475 Mich. 856

CAPCO 1998-D7 PIPESTONE, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MILTON VENTURES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Gila Shaltiel, Moshe Shaltiel, MAL Corporation, and Milton Ventures II, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 129920. COA No. 262098.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 17, 2006.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted for consideration of whether a cover letter signed by a party's attorney, accompanying a settlement agreement drafted by that attorney, satisfies the signature requirement of MCR 2.507(H).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Capco 1998-D7 Pipestone, LLC v. Milton Ventures Limited Partnership, 713 N.W.2d 769, 475 Mich. 856 (Mich. 2006).

713 N.W.2d 769 (Capco 1998-D7 Pipestone, LLC v. Milton Ventures Limited Partnership) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.