Capco 1998-D7 Pipestone, LLC v. Milton Ventures Limited Partnership
This text of 713 N.W.2d 769 (Capco 1998-D7 Pipestone, LLC v. Milton Ventures Limited Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CAPCO 1998-D7 PIPESTONE, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MILTON VENTURES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Gila Shaltiel, Moshe Shaltiel, MAL Corporation, and Milton Ventures II, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted for consideration of whether a cover letter signed by a party's attorney, accompanying a settlement agreement drafted by that attorney, satisfies the signature requirement of MCR 2.507(H).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 N.W.2d 769, 475 Mich. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capco-1998-d7-pipestone-llc-v-milton-ventures-limi-mich-2006.