Caparaso v. Durante

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Caparaso v. Durante

38 A.2d 133, 132 N.J.L. 16, 1944 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 99

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJuly 3, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 A.2d 133 (Caparaso v. Durante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caparaso v. Durante, 38 A.2d 133, 132 N.J.L. 16, 1944 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 99 (N.J. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colie, J.

The parties hereto entered into an arrangement by which Caparaso was to supply funds with which Durante was to fabricate wooden frames to be used in making ladies’ handbags. Differences arose between them and on July 15th, 1943, they agreed, in writing, to submit to arbitration. The arbitrator was given power to arbitrate “the dispute and differences between the parties, to irrevocably decide the -indebtedness of Durante to Caparaso, and of Caparaso to Durante.” An award was made by the arbitrator in favor of Durante and against Caparaso. Respondent thereupon gave notice of motion to confirm and appellant countered with a cross-motion to vacate the award. After a hearing, the Circuit Court judge signed an order reciting “that the award * * * is affirmed and that judgment be entered in favor of Egidio Durante and against Louis Caporaso for the sum of $2,307.50.” No judgment appears in the state of case and the appeal might be dismissed on that ground. However, we have considered the matter as though properly before *17 this court, and conclude that appellant lias failed to establish that the award is tainted by any of the infirmities enumerated in B. 8. 2 :40-19. The order for entry of judgment will be considered as a judgment and affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Colie, J.

The parties hereto entered into an arrangement by which Caparaso was to supply funds with which Durante was to fabricate wooden frames to be used in making ladies’ handbags. Differences arose between them and on July 15th, 1943, they agreed, in writing, to submit to arbitration. The arbitrator was given power to arbitrate “the dispute and differences between the parties, to irrevocably decide the -indebtedness of Durante to Caparaso, and of Caparaso to Durante.” An award was made by the arbitrator in favor of Durante and against Caparaso. Respondent thereupon gave notice of motion to confirm and appellant countered with a cross-motion to vacate the award. After a hearing, the Circuit Court judge signed an order reciting “that the award * * * is affirmed and that judgment be entered in favor of Egidio Durante and against Louis Caporaso for the sum of $2,307.50.” No judgment appears in the state of case and the appeal might be dismissed on that ground. However, we have considered the matter as though properly before *17 this court, and conclude that appellant lias failed to establish that the award is tainted by any of the infirmities enumerated in B. 8. 2 :40-19. The order for entry of judgment will be considered as a judgment and affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.2d 133, 132 N.J.L. 16, 1944 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caparaso-v-durante-nj-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack