Capaldo v. Capaldo
263 A.D. 984, 34 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7736
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 1942·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed on the ground that respondent, James R. Capaldo, is not one chargeable with the legal duty to support petitioner under subdivision 4 of section 101 of the Domestic Relations Court Act of the City of New York. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Capaldo v. Capaldo, 263 A.D. 984, 34 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
263 A.D. 984 (Capaldo v. Capaldo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Brown
55 Misc. 2d 174 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
McManus v. Lollar
36 Misc. 2d 1046 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Palmer v. Brown
28 Misc. 2d 642 (New York Family Court, 1961)
In re the Estate of Wood
203 Misc. 809 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1953)
In re Stanton
204 Misc. 133 (New York Family Court, 1952)
In re the Accounting of Glenn
195 Misc. 468 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Lamont v. Couteau
192 Misc. 736 (New York Family Court, 1948)