Cap S. McElroy v. Cobourn, Notnagel, Smith & Moran

Sixth Circuit

Cap S. McElroy v. Cobourn, Notnagel, Smith & Moran

209 F.2d 260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 3, 1953

Docket11830

StatusPublished

This text of 209 F.2d 260 (Cap S. McElroy v. Cobourn, Notnagel, Smith & Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cap S. McElroy v. Cobourn, Notnagel, Smith & Moran, 209 F.2d 260 (6th Cir. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard upon the record, briefs and argument for the parties, the appellant appearing in per-sonam ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the ruling of the District Judge in sustaining the motions of the appellees to dismiss the complaint with prejudice was not erroneous, see Bottone v. Linds-ley, 10 Cir., 170 F.2d 705, cited by-the District Judge;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal having been heard upon the record, briefs and argument for the parties, the appellant appearing in per-sonam ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the ruling of the District Judge in sustaining the motions of the appellees to dismiss the complaint with prejudice was not erroneous, see Bottone v. Linds-ley, 10 Cir., 170 F.2d 705, cited by-the District Judge;

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 F.2d 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cap-s-mcelroy-v-cobourn-notnagel-smith-moran-ca6-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack