Cao La v. Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc.
This text of Cao La v. Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc. (Cao La v. Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 23, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00567-CV ——————————— CAO LA, Appellant V. MORRELL MASONRY SUPPLY, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 997475
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Cao La, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding
Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138
(Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1). Further, La has
not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record, nor
the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), (c). After being notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of
prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cao La v. Morrell Masonry Supply, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cao-la-v-morrell-masonry-supply-inc-texapp-2014.