Canty v. Atlas Auto Storage, Inc.

325 So. 2d 23, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15214
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 1976·No. No. 75-411·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon, examination of the pleadings and record in this cause and upon review of [24]*24the applicable authorities, we are of the opinion that the allegations contained in plaintiff’s amended complaint were sufficient to state a cause of action. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So.2d 563.

Accordingly, the order of dismissal with prejudice is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court with respectful directions to entertain the filing of plaintiff’s second amended complaint and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. See Town of Micanopy v. Connell, Fla.App. 1st, 1974, 304 So.2d 478.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., and TED-DER, GEORGE W., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canty v. Atlas Auto Storage, Inc., 325 So. 2d 23, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15214 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

325 So. 2d 23 (Canty v. Atlas Auto Storage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters
246 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Town of Micanopy v. Connell
304 So. 2d 478 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)