Cantwell v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Cantwell v. United States

163 F.2d 782, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1947

DocketNo. 5641

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 163 F.2d 782 (Cantwell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantwell v. United States, 163 F.2d 782, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318 (4th Cir. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a sentence entered upon a plea of guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 399. The only question presented by the appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in refusing to permit appellants to withdraw their plea of guilty. No abuse of discretion is shown. On the contrary, the evidence before the court was clearly sufficient to establish guilt on the part of appellants and they offered no evidence to establish their innocence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a sentence entered upon a plea of guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 399. The only question presented by the appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in refusing to permit appellants to withdraw their plea of guilty. No abuse of discretion is shown. On the contrary, the evidence before the court was clearly sufficient to establish guilt on the part of appellants and they offered no evidence to establish their innocence.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 F.2d 782, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantwell-v-united-states-ca4-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack