Cantwell v. Cantwell
436 S.E.2d 588, 335 N.C. 235, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 549
Opinion
After reviewing the record proper and the briefs of the parties and considering the oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that defendant-appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cantwell v. Cantwell, 436 S.E.2d 588, 335 N.C. 235, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 549 (N.C. 1993).
436 S.E.2d 588 (Cantwell v. Cantwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lovendahl v. Wicker
702 S.E.2d 529 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
Jackson v. S.T. Hill Builders
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2007
Sugg v. Field
532 S.E.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)