Cantu v. Kings County

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROGER CANTU, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00538-JLT-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE KINGS COUNTY, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 76) On February 6, 2024, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. (ECF No. 76.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41 (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. 54 Dated: _ February 7, 2024 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE