Cantu, Osceas AKA Cantu, Oseas Jr AKA Cantu, Oseas Santillan
This text of Cantu, Osceas AKA Cantu, Oseas Jr AKA Cantu, Oseas Santillan (Cantu, Osceas AKA Cantu, Oseas Jr AKA Cantu, Oseas Santillan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,376-02
EX PARTE OSCEAS CANTU, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2015-DCR-00691-C IN THE 197TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CAMERON COUNTY
Per curiam. YEARY , J. filed a concurring opinion joined by SLAUGHTER, J.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to seventy-five
years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Cantu v. State, No.
13-16-00002-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburgh July 13, 2017)(not designated for
publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,
and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to hire
a medical expert, failing to hire a psychologist, failing to investigate and present evidence of false
memories. Applicant also alleges that there are new scientific studies which contradict the testimony
of the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner’s testimony from his trial and if such new scientific 2
information had been known at the time of his trial, he would not have been convicted. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.073. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief.
Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record,
the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be
represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX .
CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately
notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings
as to whether there is new scientific information which contradicts testimony at trial such that had
the new science been known at the time of trial, Applicant would not have been convicted. The trial
court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to
Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: August 24th, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cantu, Osceas AKA Cantu, Oseas Jr AKA Cantu, Oseas Santillan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantu-osceas-aka-cantu-oseas-jr-aka-cantu-oseas-santillan-texcrimapp-2022.