Cantrell v. State

101 S.W.2d 567, 131 Tex. Crim. 617, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cantrell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Tex. Crim. 240
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 1937·No. No. 18767·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for assault to murder; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

There is no brief on file for the appellant, nor are there any bills of exceptions in the record. The facts sufficiently show that appellant and her husband were separated, and that she went to the place where he lived, called him out and tried to get him to go back and live with her, and that he refused, telling her that they had tried it three or four times, and it resulted in nothing but arguments and fights, and he would not go back. After talking ten or fifteen minutes, upon the husband’s refusal to live with appellant, she asked him to take her home, ,and when he turned to go in the house to get his coat and hat she pulled a pistol from her coat pocket and shot him. As a result of the shot he lost a leg. We see no necessity for further discussion of the facts.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cantrell v. State, 101 S.W.2d 567, 131 Tex. Crim. 617, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58 (Tex. 1937).

101 S.W.2d 567 (Cantrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.