Cantrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cantrell v. State

1917 OK CR 213, 167 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 677, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 14, 1917

DocketNo. A-2536.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 213 (Cantrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantrell v. State, 1917 OK CR 213, 167 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 677, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, C. J. Cantrell, was convicted in the superior court of Muskogee county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The record discloses no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, C. J. Cantrell, was convicted in the superior court of Muskogee county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $200 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days. The record discloses no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 213, 167 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 677, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantrell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.