Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co.

266 So. 2d 368

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1972·No. No. 71-822·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. Malone v. Howell, 1939, 140 Fla. 693, 192 So. 224; Walker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 437; and Cleland v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co., 1959, 99 Ga.App. 130, 107 S.E.2d 904. See also Massey v. Standard Accident Insurance Company, 1939, 280 Ky. 23, 132 S.W.2d 530.

Affirmed.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ, and WEHLE, VICTOR O, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. Malone v. Howell, 1939, 140 Fla. 693, 192 So. 224; Walker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 437; and Cleland v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co., 1959, 99 Ga.App. 130, 107 S.E.2d 904. See also Massey v. Standard Accident Insurance Company, 1939, 280 Ky. 23, 132 S.W.2d 530.

Affirmed.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ, and WEHLE, VICTOR O, Associate Judge, concur.

Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co., 266 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

266 So. 2d 368 (Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related