Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co.

Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co.

266 So. 2d 368
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 1972
DocketNo. 71-822
StatusPublished

This text of 266 So. 2d 368 (Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cantrell v. Reserve Insurance Co., 266 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. Malone v. Howell, 1939, 140 Fla. 693, 192 So. 224; Walker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 437; and Cleland v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Ins. Co., 1959, 99 Ga.App. 130, 107 S.E.2d 904. See also Massey v. Standard Accident Insurance Company, 1939, 280 Ky. 23, 132 S.W.2d 530.

Affirmed.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ, and WEHLE, VICTOR O, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
101 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Malone v. Howell
192 So. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Massey v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.
132 S.W.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
Cleland v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance
107 S.E.2d 904 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 So. 2d 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantrell-v-reserve-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1972.