Cantrell v. Reed
This text of 123 F. App'x 269 (Cantrell v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate Jimmy Shane Cantrell appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We hold dismissal was proper because Mr. Cantrell failed to allege he exhausted his administrative remedies as to his retaliation claim against Director Norris, his claim against Captain Davis, his claim regarding improper inmate classification, and his claim regarding his loss of protective custody status. See Kozohorsky v. Harmon, 332 F.3d 1141, 1143 (8th Cir.2003) (where multiple prison-conditions claims are brought, administrative remedies must have been exhausted as to all claims).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 F. App'x 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantrell-v-reed-ca8-2005.