Cantrell v. McEwen

Ninth Circuit

Cantrell v. McEwen

454 F. App'x 581

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2011·No. No. 09-55386·Published

Opinion

[582]*582ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judges Schroeder and Gould voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Seeborg has so recommended.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[582]*582ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judges Schroeder and Gould voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Seeborg has so recommended.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

Cantrell v. McEwen, 454 F. App'x 581 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

454 F. App'x 581 (Cantrell v. McEwen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.