Cantrell v. McEwen

Ninth Circuit

Cantrell v. McEwen

454 F. App'x 581

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 2011

DocketNo. 09-55386

StatusPublished

This text of 454 F. App'x 581 (Cantrell v. McEwen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantrell v. McEwen, 454 F. App'x 581 (9th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[582]*582ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judges Schroeder and Gould voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Seeborg has so recommended.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[582]*582ORDER

The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing. Judges Schroeder and Gould voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Seeborg has so recommended.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

454 F. App'x 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantrell-v-mcewen-ca9-2011.