Cantrell v. Mayo
173 F.2d 220, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2831
This text of 173 F.2d 220 (Cantrell v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cantrell v. Mayo, 173 F.2d 220, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2831 (5th Cir. 1949).
Opinion
The applicant for the writ of habeas corpus not having exhausted his remedies in the State courts, the District Judge properly declined to interfere. Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 116, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 L.Ed. 572; Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672, 681, 68 S.Ct. 1270.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ex Parte Hawk
321 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1944)
Wade v. Mayo
334 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 F.2d 220, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantrell-v-mayo-ca5-1949.