Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville
287 S.W.2d 813, 1956 Mo. LEXIS 619
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 S.W.2d 646 →
Opinion
In this case the trial court rendered jüdgment abating plaintiffs’ claim and dismissing their petition. The judgment was based on the ground of res judicata. The judgment is affirmed. See Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, Mo.Sup., 249 S.W.2d 425; Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, 363 Mo. 938, 255 S.W.2d 785; Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, Mo.Sup., 267 S.W.2d 646; Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, D.C.E.D. Mo., 128 F.Supp. 637; Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, 8 Cir., 222 F.2d 428.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville, 287 S.W.2d 813, 1956 Mo. LEXIS 619 (Mo. 1956).
287 S.W.2d 813 (Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. L. Cantrell and Samuel Castleberry v. City of Caruthersville, a Municipal Corporation
222 F.2d 428 (Eighth Circuit, 1955)
Wailes v. Curators of Central College
254 S.W.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1953)
Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville
255 S.W.2d 785 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1953)
Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville
267 S.W.2d 646 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1954)
Cantrell v. City of Caruthersville
128 F. Supp. 637 (E.D. Arkansas, 1955)