Cantrell Lamont Spears v. State
This text of Cantrell Lamont Spears v. State (Cantrell Lamont Spears v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed February 25, 2015.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00542-CR
CANTRELL LAMONT SPEARS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13-63609-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown
Cantrell Lamont Spears waived a jury and pleaded guilty to robbery. See TEX. PENAL
CODE ANN. § 29.02(a) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’
imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in
effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12
(Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We
advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate
courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47
140542F.U05
-2- Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
CANTRELL LAMONT SPEARS, Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13-63609-M). No. 05-14-00542-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Bridges and Fillmore participating. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered February 25, 2015.
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cantrell Lamont Spears v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantrell-lamont-spears-v-state-texapp-2015.