Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary

210 A.D.2d 282, 620 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12579

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1994·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the defendants from disseminating purportedly inaccurate information contained in his medical records, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated September 22, 1993, which denied his motion to reargue his motion for a preliminary injunction, which was denied in part by order of the same court, dated July 22, 1993.

[283] Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 22, 1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Brosnan v Behette, 186 AD2d 165). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the defendants from disseminating purportedly inaccurate information contained in his medical records, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated September 22, 1993, which denied his motion to reargue his motion for a preliminary injunction, which was denied in part by order of the same court, dated July 22, 1993.

[283] Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 22, 1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Brosnan v Behette, 186 AD2d 165). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary, 210 A.D.2d 282, 620 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

210 A.D.2d 282 (Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related