Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary

210 A.D.2d 282, 620 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 282 (Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantos v. New York State Eye & Ear Infirmary, 210 A.D.2d 282, 620 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the defendants from disseminating purportedly inaccurate information contained in his medical records, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated September 22, 1993, which denied his motion to reargue his motion for a preliminary injunction, which was denied in part by order of the same court, dated July 22, 1993.

[283]*283Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 22, 1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Brosnan v Behette, 186 AD2d 165). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to enjoin the defendants from disseminating purportedly inaccurate information contained in his medical records, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated September 22, 1993, which denied his motion to reargue his motion for a preliminary injunction, which was denied in part by order of the same court, dated July 22, 1993.

[283]*283Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 22, 1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Brosnan v Behette, 186 AD2d 165). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 282, 620 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantos-v-new-york-state-eye-ear-infirmary-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack