Cantor v. Vim Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantor v. Vim Electric Co.

248 A.D. 734

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff, a painter employed by defendant, was injured by the collapse of a scaffold by reason of a defective support. He brought an action for damages, claiming the right to do so in as much as defendant had not provided insurance as required by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Two of the issues litigated on the trial were whether plaintiff was in fact an employee of defendant and whether there was insurance coverage. The trial court, which passed upon the facts as well as upon the law, decided both issues in favor of plaintiff and gave judgment in his favor. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff, a painter employed by defendant, was injured by the collapse of a scaffold by reason of a defective support. He brought an action for damages, claiming the right to do so in as much as defendant had not provided insurance as required by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Two of the issues litigated on the trial were whether plaintiff was in fact an employee of defendant and whether there was insurance coverage. The trial court, which passed upon the facts as well as upon the law, decided both issues in favor of plaintiff and gave judgment in his favor. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cantor v. Vim Electric Co., 248 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 734 (Cantor v. Vim Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related