Cantor v. Vim Electric Co.
This text of 248 A.D. 734 (Cantor v. Vim Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, a painter employed by defendant, was injured by the collapse of a scaffold by reason of a defective support. He brought an action for damages, claiming the right to do so in as much as defendant had not provided insurance as required by the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Two of the issues litigated on the trial were whether plaintiff was in fact an employee of defendant and whether there was insurance coverage. The trial court, which passed upon the facts as well as upon the law, decided both issues in favor of plaintiff and gave judgment in his favor. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantor-v-vim-electric-co-nyappdiv-1936.