Cantor v. Radin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantor v. Radin

261 A.D. 933, 25 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8152

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 933 (Cantor v. Radin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantor v. Radin, 261 A.D. 933, 25 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8152 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Action

against defendant Radin, another physician and a layman, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff through their negligence in treating her for the removal of superfluous hair from her face. Plaintiff upon the trial of the issues of fact was awarded a jury verdict against defendants assessing her damages. Upon that verdict judgment was not entered until after defendant Radin received a discharge in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Act as it existed before its amendment effective September 22, 1938. An order was made at Special Term denying defendant Radin’s motion, made under section 150 of the Debtor and Creditor Law, to cancel and discharge that judgment as against him. From that order defendant Radin appeals. Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements; the examination of the appellant as judgment debtor in supplementary proceedings to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action

against defendant Radin, another physician and a layman, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff through their negligence in treating her for the removal of superfluous hair from her face. Plaintiff upon the trial of the issues of fact was awarded a jury verdict against defendants assessing her damages. Upon that verdict judgment was not entered until after defendant Radin received a discharge in bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Act as it existed before its amendment effective September 22, 1938. An order was made at Special Term denying defendant Radin’s motion, made under section 150 of the Debtor and Creditor Law, to cancel and discharge that judgment as against him. From that order defendant Radin appeals. Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements; the examination of the appellant as judgment debtor in supplementary proceedings to proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order to be entered hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 933, 25 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantor-v-radin-nyappdiv-1941.