Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad

155 Misc. 805, 278 N.Y.S. 448, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1056

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 9, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When plaintiff purchased a season ticket from the defendant the contract between the parties included the provisions of the tariffs filed by the defendant. The defendant was, therefore, justified in forfeiting the season ticket when presented by a stranger.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

When plaintiff purchased a season ticket from the defendant the contract between the parties included the provisions of the tariffs filed by the defendant. The defendant was, therefore, justified in forfeiting the season ticket when presented by a stranger.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 155 Misc. 805, 278 N.Y.S. 448, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

155 Misc. 805 (Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related