Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad

155 Misc. 805, 278 N.Y.S. 448, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1056

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 Misc. 805 (Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 155 Misc. 805, 278 N.Y.S. 448, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1056 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When plaintiff purchased a season ticket from the defendant the contract between the parties included the provisions of the tariffs filed by the defendant. The defendant was, therefore, justified in forfeiting the season ticket when presented by a stranger.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

When plaintiff purchased a season ticket from the defendant the contract between the parties included the provisions of the tariffs filed by the defendant. The defendant was, therefore, justified in forfeiting the season ticket when presented by a stranger.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 Misc. 805, 278 N.Y.S. 448, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantor-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappterm-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack