Cantor v. Boxer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantor v. Boxer

248 A.D. 819, 290 N.Y.S. 749, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7493

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 819 (Cantor v. Boxer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantor v. Boxer, 248 A.D. 819, 290 N.Y.S. 749, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7493 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting the motion of certain defendants for a bill of particulars modified by strildng from the items the words “ precisely ” and “ exact ” wherever they appear, and by inserting therein a provision that the particulars are to be given by the plaintiff if she knows them; otherwise that she shall so state. As so modified the order is affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents. The particulars, or the statement in lieu thereof, is to be furnished within five days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Davis, JJ., vote to modify the order by eliminating all items except No. 1 and No. 12 and as so modified to affirm the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting the motion of certain defendants for a bill of particulars modified by strildng from the items the words “ precisely ” and “ exact ” wherever they appear, and by inserting therein a provision that the particulars are to be given by the plaintiff if she knows them; otherwise that she shall so state. As so modified the order is affirmed, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents. The particulars, or the statement in lieu thereof, is to be furnished within five days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Davis, JJ., vote to modify the order by eliminating all items except No. 1 and No. 12 and as so modified to affirm the order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 819, 290 N.Y.S. 749, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantor-v-boxer-nyappdiv-1936.