Cantor v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: October 30, 2020
• Docket: 1:20-cv-09035
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK tr rrr rr rrr re ee ee ee ee ee ee er ee ee ee eee ee HH MARIANNE W. CANTOR, et ano., Plaintiff(s), -against- 20-cv-9035(LAK) AMF BOWLING CENTERS INC., et al.,

Defendant(s) ee ee □□ ere ee ee eee er ee er er tr rete eee eee ee HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: 4 L The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Oo The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990), oO The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). C The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before November 10, 2020, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be or remanded. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 30, 2020

Lewi¥ A. Kapla United States District Judge