Cantor v. 255 West 15th Holding Corp.
This text of 28 Misc. 2d 503 (Cantor v. 255 West 15th Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Though the jury waiver clause would have entitled the defendant to have the action stricken from the Jury Calendar (Caplan v. Goldman, 197 Misc. 404), if the defendant intended to challenge the plaintiff’s right to jury trial, it was bound to act seasonably and with diligence. The defendant was not free to wait until the eve of trial, as it did here, while meanwhile the action was waiting to be reached on the Jury Calendar, before moving to strike it from that calendar (Arkin v. Heller Co., 197 Misc. 1084). Since the delay was wholly unexplained, it was error to strike the cause from the Jury Calendar.
The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.
Concur — Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Misc. 2d 503, 207 N.Y.S.2d 535, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantor-v-255-west-15th-holding-corp-nyappterm-1960.