Cantley v. City of Port St. Joe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cantley v. City of Port St. Joe

868 So. 2d 606, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2937, 2004 WL 438531

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-0078

StatusPublished

This text of 868 So. 2d 606 (Cantley v. City of Port St. Joe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantley v. City of Port St. Joe, 868 So. 2d 606, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2937, 2004 WL 438531 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the hearing on Robert F. Cantley, Jr.’s petition for benefits alleging psychiatric permanent and total disability caused by accidents occurring on October 15, 1991, and November 29, 1996, the judge of compensation claims excluded the depositions given by Dr. Zumarraga. This was error. Mr. Cantley is entitled to a determination on the merits of his claim for permanent and total disability benefits, a claim which has never previously been adjudicated. The judge of compensation claims should consider all evidence relevant to the claim, including Dr. Zumarra-ga’s depositions.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At the hearing on Robert F. Cantley, Jr.’s petition for benefits alleging psychiatric permanent and total disability caused by accidents occurring on October 15, 1991, and November 29, 1996, the judge of compensation claims excluded the depositions given by Dr. Zumarraga. This was error. Mr. Cantley is entitled to a determination on the merits of his claim for permanent and total disability benefits, a claim which has never previously been adjudicated. The judge of compensation claims should consider all evidence relevant to the claim, including Dr. Zumarra-ga’s depositions.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

KAHN, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 So. 2d 606, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2937, 2004 WL 438531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantley-v-city-of-port-st-joe-fladistctapp-2004.