Cantley & Co. v. Moody
This text of 7 Port. 443 (Cantley & Co. v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The errors assigned in this case, we think are not available. Upon looking into the record, we find the writ is returned, “ executed,” by the sheriff, and must intend that it was executed on all the defendants below, as all were entitled to service before the Circuit court could legally have rendered its judgment.
In regard to the objection, that the first name of Page, one of the plaintiffs in error, should have been set out at length, and not merely the initial, we think it not well taken. The objection, at most, could only be made available by plea in abatement, disclosing his true name.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Port. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantley-co-v-moody-ala-1838.