Cantine v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cantine v. New York City Transit Authority

54 A.D.2d 697, 387 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14265

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 697 (Cantine v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cantine v. New York City Transit Authority, 54 A.D.2d 697, 387 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14265 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated November 24, 1975, and made after a hearing, which found petitioner guilty of certain specifications and demoted him from the position of Supervisor, Track, to the position of Assistant Supervisor, Track. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, with costs. Upon the evidence adduced at the hearing, we believe that petitioner’s guilt was properly determined, and that the punishment imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to shock [698]*698one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated November 24, 1975, and made after a hearing, which found petitioner guilty of certain specifications and demoted him from the position of Supervisor, Track, to the position of Assistant Supervisor, Track. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, with costs. Upon the evidence adduced at the hearing, we believe that petitioner’s guilt was properly determined, and that the punishment imposed was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to shock [698]*698one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 697, 387 N.Y.S.2d 543, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantine-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1976.