Cantillo v. State
91 S.W.2d 355
This text of 91 S.W.2d 355 (Cantillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cantillo v. State, 91 S.W.2d 355 (Tex. 1936).
Opinion
Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.
t Since the conviction the law upon which the prosecution was predicated has been repealed • without any saving clause. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W. (2d) 481.
The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 S.W.2d 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cantillo-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.