Canseco v. State
12 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9812, 2009 WL 2060113
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 2009
Docket1D09-0263
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 12 So. 3d 923 (Canseco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Canseco v. State, 12 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9812, 2009 WL 2060113 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
We affirm but certify the same issue as certified in State v. Freijo, 987 So.2d 190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), as being one of great public importance.
WHETHER A DEFENDANT MAY OBTAIN THE BENEFIT OF A NEW TWO-YEAR WINDOW PERIOD UNDER STATE V. GREEN, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006), IF THE CLAIMANT RECEIVED ACTUAL NOTICE OF A DEPORTATION PROCEEDING MORE THAN TWO YEARS BEFORE THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Canseco v. State
52 So. 3d 575 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9812, 2009 WL 2060113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canseco-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.