Canonge v. Cauchoix

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Canonge v. Cauchoix

9 Mart. 452

DecidedMay 15, 1822

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Mart. 452 (Canonge v. Cauchoix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canonge v. Cauchoix, 9 Mart. 452 (La. 1822).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court, 1 This is an action on a promissory note, pro-1 j i tested on Saturday, the second of August, 1820 — notice was given to the endorser, the defendant, on Tuesday the fifth. There was judgment for him, and the plaintiff* appealed.

The parish court was correct in deciding, that, as the endorser resides in New-Orleans, he ought to have had notice on Monday the 4th, the day following the protest, the intervening Sunday being excluded. Chittyon Bills, 326, Am. ed. 241, Smith vs. Mullet, 2 Camp. 208.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the parish court be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.

delivered the opinion of the court, 1 This is an action on a promissory note, pro-1 j i tested on Saturday, the second of August, 1820 — notice was given to the endorser, the defendant, on Tuesday the fifth. There was judgment for him, and the plaintiff* appealed.

The parish court was correct in deciding, that, as the endorser resides in New-Orleans, he ought to have had notice on Monday the 4th, the day following the protest, the intervening Sunday being excluded. Chittyon Bills, 326, Am. ed. 241, Smith vs. Mullet, 2 Camp. 208.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the parish court be affirmed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Mart. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canonge-v-cauchoix-la-1822.