Canocchioli v. Ruppert

9 A.D.2d 765, 192 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6365
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 2, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 9 A.D.2d 765 (Canocchioli v. Ruppert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canocchioli v. Ruppert, 9 A.D.2d 765, 192 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract, the appeal is from an order modifying appellant’s notice to examine respondents before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion on the record presented to modify the notice of examination before trial by vacating provisions thereof which directed the production of documents, correspondence, books and records relating to the issues between the parties with respect to damages. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graphic Offset Co. v. Torre
78 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Leeponis v. Garcy Corp.
61 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.2d 765, 192 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canocchioli-v-ruppert-nyappdiv-1959.