Canocchioli v. Ruppert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Canocchioli v. Ruppert

9 A.D.2d 765, 192 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6365

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 1959·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract, the appeal is from an order modifying appellant’s notice to examine respondents before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion on the record presented to modify the notice of examination before trial by vacating provisions thereof which directed the production of documents, correspondence, books and records relating to the issues between the parties with respect to damages. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract, the appeal is from an order modifying appellant’s notice to examine respondents before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion on the record presented to modify the notice of examination before trial by vacating provisions thereof which directed the production of documents, correspondence, books and records relating to the issues between the parties with respect to damages. Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Canocchioli v. Ruppert, 9 A.D.2d 765, 192 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

9 A.D.2d 765 (Canocchioli v. Ruppert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related