Cano v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cano v. State

355 S.W.2d 536, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1180

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 7, 1962

DocketNo. 34343

StatusPublished

This text of 355 S.W.2d 536 (Cano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cano v. State, 355 S.W.2d 536, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1180 (Tex. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 90 days in jail and a fine of $150.00.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

Appellant’s sole contention, which is presented by formal bill of exception No. 1, is that the complaint did not have the same file number as the information and was not attached to the information.

The complaint and information before us appear to have been filed on the same day and are regular on their face.

There is no motion to quash the information in the record, and our consideration of the alleged error is precluded by Article 523, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and our holdings in Billingslea v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 244, 268 S.W.2d 668, and Howard v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 114, 247 S.W.2d 112.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment-of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI