Cano v. State

95 So. 3d 476, 2012 WL 3764499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14641
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 2012
DocketNo. 1D11-5567
StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 3d 476 (Cano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cano v. State, 95 So. 3d 476, 2012 WL 3764499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14641 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences for lewd and lascivious molestation (Count 1) and sexual battery (Count 3). We reverse Appellant’s conviction and sentence for sexual battery (Count 2). As the State concedes, its evidence was insufficient to support that conviction. See Beber v. State, 887 So.2d 1248 (Fla.2004).

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

DAVIS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beber v. State
887 So. 2d 1248 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 So. 3d 476, 2012 WL 3764499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cano-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.