Cano v. State
95 So. 3d 476, 2012 WL 3764499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14641
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences for lewd and lascivious molestation (Count 1) and sexual battery (Count 3). We reverse Appellant’s conviction and sentence for sexual battery (Count 2). As the State concedes, its evidence was insufficient to support that conviction. See Beber v. State, 887 So.2d 1248 (Fla.2004).
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cano v. State, 95 So. 3d 476, 2012 WL 3764499, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14641 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
95 So. 3d 476 (Cano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beber v. State
887 So. 2d 1248 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)