Cannovan v. Thompson
This text of 12 Tex. 247 (Cannovan v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As no statement of facts has been sent up with the record, the judgment must be presumed to be correct, and must be sustained. Some of the charges of the Court,1 it is true, are utterly erroneous and subversive of the law of' the land, as repeatedly declared by this Court, but there were substantial grounds of defence, as pleaded, and if these or any of them were supported by evidence, the jury were authorized to find their verdict. Without a statement of facts we have-no evidence that the note sued upon was adduced in evidence, or that there was any proof which would have entitled the plaintiff to judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Tex. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannovan-v-thompson-tex-1854.