Cannon v. Titus

5 Johns. 355
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit of merits is defective, in not stating that the defendant was advised by counsel; and by the rule of this court, of the 21st November, 1808, a copy of the affidavit of merits, filed with the clerk of the sittings, must be served on the opposite party.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cannon v. Titus, 5 Johns. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

5 Johns. 355 (Cannon v. Titus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
Oneieda Manufacturing Society v. Lawrence
4 Cow. 440 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)