Cannon v. Titus
5 Johns. 355
This text of 5 Johns. 355 (Cannon v. Titus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cannon v. Titus, 5 Johns. 355 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).
Opinion
The affidavit of merits is defective, in not stating that the defendant was advised by counsel; and by the rule of this court, of the 21st November, 1808, a copy of the affidavit of merits, filed with the clerk of the sittings, must be served on the opposite party.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
Oneieda Manufacturing Society v. Lawrence
4 Cow. 440 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Johns. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cannon-v-titus-nysupct-1810.